[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070409114827.d3cbf705.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:48:27 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...e.de
Subject: Re: [QUICKLIST 1/4] Quicklists for page table pages V5
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> wrote:
> On x86_64 this cuts allocation overhead for page table pages down to
> a fraction (kernel compile / editing load. TSC based measurement
> of times spend in each function):
>
> no quicklist
>
> pte_alloc 1569048 4.3s(401ns/2.7us/179.7us)
> pmd_alloc 780988 2.1s(337ns/2.7us/86.1us)
> pud_alloc 780072 2.2s(424ns/2.8us/300.6us)
> pgd_alloc 260022 1s(920ns/4us/263.1us)
>
> quicklist:
>
> pte_alloc 452436 573.4ms(8ns/1.3us/121.1us)
> pmd_alloc 196204 174.5ms(7ns/889ns/46.1us)
> pud_alloc 195688 172.4ms(7ns/881ns/151.3us)
> pgd_alloc 65228 9.8ms(8ns/150ns/6.1us)
>
> pgd allocations are the most complex and there we see the most dramatic
> improvement (may be we can cut down the amount of pgds cached somewhat?).
> But even the pte allocations still see a doubling of performance.
Was there any observeable change in overall runtime?
What are the numbers in parentheses?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists