[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704091149160.8783@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...e.de
Subject: Re: [QUICKLIST 1/4] Quicklists for page table pages V5
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
> Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> wrote:
>
> > On x86_64 this cuts allocation overhead for page table pages down to
> > a fraction (kernel compile / editing load. TSC based measurement
> > of times spend in each function):
> >
> > no quicklist
> >
> > pte_alloc 1569048 4.3s(401ns/2.7us/179.7us)
> > pmd_alloc 780988 2.1s(337ns/2.7us/86.1us)
> > pud_alloc 780072 2.2s(424ns/2.8us/300.6us)
> > pgd_alloc 260022 1s(920ns/4us/263.1us)
> >
> > quicklist:
> >
> > pte_alloc 452436 573.4ms(8ns/1.3us/121.1us)
> > pmd_alloc 196204 174.5ms(7ns/889ns/46.1us)
> > pud_alloc 195688 172.4ms(7ns/881ns/151.3us)
> > pgd_alloc 65228 9.8ms(8ns/150ns/6.1us)
> >
> > pgd allocations are the most complex and there we see the most dramatic
> > improvement (may be we can cut down the amount of pgds cached somewhat?).
> > But even the pte allocations still see a doubling of performance.
>
> Was there any observeable change in overall runtime?
The kernel compile times fluctuates as usual. There was a tendency for the
times to be less but no clear win as discussed before.
> What are the numbers in parentheses?
(minimum/average/maximum)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists