[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070409134057.2d249f0c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 13:40:57 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: align rq to cacheline boundary
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:08:53 -0700
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:
> Align the per cpu runqueue to the cacheline boundary. This will minimize the
> number of cachelines touched during remote wakeup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index b9a6837..eca33c5 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ struct rq {
> struct lock_class_key rq_lock_key;
> };
>
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rq, runqueues);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rq, runqueues) ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
Remember that this can consume up to (linesize-4 * NR_CPUS) bytes, which is
rather a lot.
Remember also that the linesize on VSMP is 4k.
And that putting a gap in the per-cpu memory like this will reduce its
overall cache-friendliness.
Need more convincing, please.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists