linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm] swsusp: Use rbtree for tracking allocated swap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1176152452.10245.42.camel@nigel.suspend2.net>
Date:	Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:00:52 +1000
From:	Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm] swsusp: Use rbtree for tracking allocated swap

Hi.

On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 15:03 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 8 April 2007 23:07, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> [--snip--]
> > > > Normal usage in both cases is simply iterating through the list, so I
> > > > guess the cost would be approximately the same.
> > > > 
> > > > Deletion could would include rebalancing for the rb_nodes.
> > > 
> > > In swsusp the deletions are needed only if there's an error.
> > 
> > When freeing swap at the end of the cycle?
> 
> That depends on what you mean by 'the end'. :-)
> 
> We free swap if the image saving fails only, since it's allocated after we've
> created the image.  After the resume, the state of swap from before the image
> creation is the current one anyway.

Ah, of course. I forgot that temporarily.

Nigel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/