linux-kernel - problem in 2.6.21-rc6-mm1: i386-enable-4k-stacks-by-default.patch?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <461ABF63.3040703@goop.org>
Date:	Mon, 09 Apr 2007 15:34:11 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: problem in 2.6.21-rc6-mm1: i386-enable-4k-stacks-by-default.patch?

--- a/arch/i386/Kconfig.debug~i386-enable-4k-stacks-by-default
+++ a/arch/i386/Kconfig.debug
@@ -57,14 +57,16 @@ config DEBUG_RODATA
 	  If in doubt, say "N".
 
 config 4KSTACKS
-	bool "Use 4Kb for kernel stacks instead of 8Kb"
-	depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
+	bool "Use 4Kb for kernel stacks instead of 8Kb" if DEBUG_KERNEL
+	depends on n
+	default y


I don't see this option appear in my .config, and I guess its always
using 8k stacks.  If I remove the "depends on n", it does what I expect
it to do (ie, offers me the option).  Is "depends on n" supposed to do
something, or is it just a bogon?

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/