linux-kernel - Re: Ten percent test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1176098768.6355.114.camel@Homer.simpson.net>
Date:	Mon, 09 Apr 2007 08:06:08 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>
Subject: Re: Ten percent test

On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 01:16 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 09 April 2007, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >So tar -cvf - / | gzip --best | tar -tvzf - should reproduce the
> >problem?
> >
> >	-Mike
> 
> That looks as if it should demo it pretty well if I understand correctly 
> everything you're doing there.

Well, I let it process my ~250GB of data with my current tree, and it
looked utterly harmless (and since I'm running SMP, was of course).
I'll try building UP to make sure, and check mainline as well.

	-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/