[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070409110333.GA253@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 15:03:33 +0400
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] scheduler: first timeslice of the exiting thread
On 04/09, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> >
> > a) On sched_fork, the creator share its timeslice with new process.
> > b) On sched_exit, if the exiting process didn't exhaust its first
> > timeslice yet, it gives its timeslice to the parent.
> >
> > It has no problem on the process model since the creator is the parent.
> > However, on the thread model, the creator is not the parent, it is same
> > as the creator's parent. Hence, on this kind of program, the creator
> > can't retrieve shared timeslice and exausts its timeslice at a rate of
> > knots. In addition, somehow, the parent (typically shell?) gets extra
> > timeslice.
>
> Yes, this is an old oddity.
Perhaps
void sched_exit(struct task_struct *p)
{
task_t *t, *did_fork = p->parent;
if (!thread_group_leader(p))
list_for_each_entry(t, p->thread_group)
if (!t->exit_state) {
did_fork = t;
break;
}
... give time_slice to did_fork ..
}
may improve things a little bit, because the rest of time_slice doesn't leak
off the thread group.
However this is not very nice and we have the same problem with CLONE_PARENT.
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists