[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <461A2B59.3090406@garzik.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 08:02:33 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 07:13:05AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> It should be noted, mainly for russell's benefit, that the ->irq_ack()
>> hook is only called if a debug define is manually enabled in libata.h,
>> in a single callsite.
>>
>> The number of people that actually use the hook -- kernel hackers
>> debugging screaming interrupts -- can probably be counted on one hand.
>
> Ok, in that case it makes sense for me to set this to ata_dummy_irq_ack
> since I don't have any additional status registers specific to the
> interface.
>
> Presumably a similar change to pata_platform.c would be appropriate?
I was just pointing out the practical reality.
The proper implementation of the hook is likely /not/ a dummy on your
platform.
I presume you clear the interrupt condition by reading the ATA shadow
register 'Status', like most other SFF-like controllers, so your
implementation of ->irq_ack() should reflect that.
The proper implementation is basically what Alan described:
ata_irq_ack() minus the BMDMA bitbanging.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists