linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] pata

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 09 Apr 2007 08:02:33 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver

Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 07:13:05AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> It should be noted, mainly for russell's benefit, that the ->irq_ack() 
>> hook is only called if a debug define is manually enabled in libata.h, 
>> in a single callsite.
>>
>> The number of people that actually use the hook -- kernel hackers 
>> debugging screaming interrupts -- can probably be counted on one hand.
> 
> Ok, in that case it makes sense for me to set this to ata_dummy_irq_ack
> since I don't have any additional status registers specific to the
> interface.
> 
> Presumably a similar change to pata_platform.c would be appropriate?

I was just pointing out the practical reality.

The proper implementation of the hook is likely /not/ a dummy on your 
platform.

I presume you clear the interrupt condition by reading the ATA shadow 
register 'Status', like most other SFF-like controllers, so your 
implementation of ->irq_ack() should reflect that.

The proper implementation is basically what Alan described: 
ata_irq_ack() minus the BMDMA bitbanging.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/