[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <461B48A0.5010009@garzik.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 04:19:44 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de>,
Dave Dillow <dave@...dillows.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: I give up
Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 April 2007, Olaf Hering wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 09, Dave Dillow wrote:
>>> It's not /dev he's backing up -- its /home, /usr, and others. GNU tar
>>> saves the device and inode numbers from the {,l}stat() call on each
>>> file and decides it is a new file if either number changes from run to
>>> run.
>> So fix tar to not do silly things.
>> Kernel major:minor numbers are not stable.
>
> YOU Tell that to the tar/star people, they are flabbergasted that its not
> stable. It apparently is for every other OS tar can be run on.
It's just the new world that we live in.
I don't see us ever going back to 100% static major/minors.
Though as a point of history, Linux has /always/ supported dynamic
major/minor numbers, even back in 0.99 days. We avoided the problem
then because the dynamic major/minors were only used by drivers that had
not yet had static numbers assigned, or their author chose to avoid
LANANA for some other reason.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists