[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <461B5339.50700@trash.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:04:57 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jgarzik@...ox.com,
cramerj <cramerj@...el.com>,
"Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
"Leech, Christopher" <christopher.leech@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NET: [UPDATED] Multiqueue network device support implementation.
Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P wrote:
> Thanks Pat for the initial feedback. I can post a set of patches to
> e1000 using the new API; I'll try to get them out asap (need to apply to
> this kernel tree).
Thanks.
> However, the PRIO qdisc still uses the priority in
> the bands for dequeueing priority, and will feed the queues on the NIC.
> The e1000, and any other multiqueue NIC, will schedule Tx based on how
> the PRIO qdisc feeds the queues. So the only priority here is the
> dequeuing priority from the kernel. The e1000 will use the new API for
> starting/stopping the individual queues based on the descriptors
> available, much like it does today for the global queue.
Packets will only be dequeued from a band if the associated subqueue
is active, which moves the decision from prio to the driver, no?
What policy does e1000 use for scheduling its internal queues?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists