[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a36005b50704100710i28d5681fsdab6deb1d5161e28@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:10:48 -0700
From: "Ulrich Drepper" <drepper@...il.com>
To: "Theodore Tso" <tytso@....edu>,
"Trond Myklebust" <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
"Jörn Engel" <joern@...ybastard.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>,
"Ulrich Drepper" <drepper@...il.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Neil Brown" <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: Re: If not readdir() then what?
On 4/10/07, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> That might work. But if in the long term we want to separate out what
> we can send back via telldir/seekdir, and some future new Posix
> interface, [...]
With all these discussions about fixes for telldir, do we want to
persue an alternative interface where the user can explicitly specify
that no telldir/seekdir will ever be used? From what I know so far it
would make technical sense since we could speed up/reduce the memory
footprint of readdir in 99% of most programs. But is the benefit
large enough to warrant a second interface?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists