lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070410145220.GB3611@in.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:22:20 +0530
From:	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
To:	menage@...gle.com
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, sekharan@...ibm.com, dev@...ru,
	xemul@...ru, serue@...ibm.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	containers@...ts.osdl.org, mbligh@...gle.com, rohitseth@...gle.com,
	devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] Containers (V8): Add generic multi-subsystem API to containers

On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 04:32:24PM -0700, menage@...gle.com wrote:
> +struct container_subsys {
> +	int (*create)(struct container_subsys *ss,
> +		      struct container *cont);
> +	void (*destroy)(struct container_subsys *ss, struct container *cont);
> +	int (*can_attach)(struct container_subsys *ss,
> +			  struct container *cont, struct task_struct *tsk);
> +	void (*attach)(struct container_subsys *ss, struct container *cont,
> +			struct container *old_cont, struct task_struct *tsk);
> +	void (*fork)(struct container_subsys *ss, struct task_struct *task);
> +	void (*exit)(struct container_subsys *ss, struct task_struct *task);
> +	int (*populate)(struct container_subsys *ss,
> +			struct container *cont);
> +	void (*bind)(struct container_subsys *ss, struct container *root);

Is the first argument into all the callbacks, struct container_subsys *ss,
necessary?

> +struct container_subsys cpuset_subsys = {
> +	.name = "cpuset",
> +	.create = cpuset_create,
> +	.destroy  = cpuset_destroy,
> +	.can_attach = cpuset_can_attach,
> +	.attach = cpuset_attach,
> +	.populate = cpuset_populate,
> +	.subsys_id = cpuset_subsys_id,
> +	.early_init = 1,
> +};

We seem to be missing a register call here as well ..

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ