[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <461BA956.5010107@tmr.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:12:22 -0400
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@...ricas.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: init's children list is long and slows reaping children.
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>>> Maybe "struct posix_process" is more descriptive? "struct process_posix"?
>>> "Ugly POSIX process semantics data" seems simple enough to stick in a struct
>>> name. "struct uglyposix_process"?
>> Guys, you didn't read my message.
>>
>> It's *not* about "process" stuff. Anything that tries to call it a
>> "process" is *by*definition* worse than what it is now. Processes have all
>> the things that we've cleanly separated out for filesystem, VM, SysV
>> semaphore state, namespaces etc.
>>
>> The "struct signal_struct" is the random *leftovers* from all the other
>> stuff. It's *not* about "processes". Never has been, and never will be.
>
> I proposed "struct task_shared_ctx" but you ducked :)
>
Descriptive, correct, I like it!
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists