[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070410155314.GA16267@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:53:14 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jack Steiner <steiner@...ricas.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: init's children list is long and slows reaping children.
* Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
> > so ... is anyone pursuing this? This would allow us to make
> > sys_wait4() faster and more scalable: no tasklist_lock bouncing for
> > example.
>
> which part?
all of it :) Everything you mentioned makes sense quite a bit. The
thread signal handling of do_wait was added in a pretty arbitrary
fashion so i doubt there are strong requirements in that area. Apps
might have grown to get used to it meanwhile though, so we've got to do
it carefully.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists