[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070410155454.GA1949@2ka.mipt.ru>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:54:54 +0400
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
To: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jgarzik@...ox.com,
cramerj <cramerj@...el.com>,
"Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
"Leech, Christopher" <christopher.leech@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] NET: Multiqueue network device support implementation.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 08:41:49AM -0700, Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P (peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com) wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 02:28:41PM -0700, Peter P Waskiewicz
> > Jr (peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com) wrote:
> > > + alloc_size = (sizeof(struct net_device_subqueue) * queue_count);
> > > +
> > > + p = kzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!p) {
> > > + printk(KERN_ERR "alloc_netdev: Unable to
> > allocate queues.\n");
> > > + return NULL;
> >
> > I think you either do not want to print it, or want
> > additional details about device...
>
> Ok. This is essentially the same output printed if the netdev itself
> cannot be allocated. Should I update both strings to have more
> device-specific information?
I wonder, if it is ever possible with gfp_kernel...
I think different patch would be ok.
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists