[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070410162626.GB31505@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:26:27 -0700
From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...l.org, ak@...e.de, gregkh@...e.de, muli@...ibm.com,
asit.k.mallick@...el.com, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
shaohua.li@...el.com
Subject: Re: [patch 1/8] [Intel IOMMU] ACPI support for Intel Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 11:39:19PM -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> On Monday 09 April 2007 17:55, Ashok Raj wrote:
> > This patch contains basic ACPI parsing and enumeration support.
>
> AFAICS, ACPI supplies the envelope which delivers the table,
> and ACPI has some convenience structure definitions for that
> table in include/acpi/actbl1.h (primarily for the acpixtract table dis-assembler),
> but ACPI is otherwise not involved in IOMMU support.
>
> Indeed, one might argue that all new functions in this patch series with
> "acpi..." would more appropriately be called "pci...", since a cursory
> scan of the IOMMU spec seems to suggest it is specific to PCI.
Think we can migrate some of the code to make the core part just perform
the get-table. We will do that in the next respin.
>
> So on first blush, it looks like the only call to a function that begins with
> "acpi" in this patch series should be acpi_get_table() from some IOMMU
> specific file outside of drivers/acpi,
> and the only modification to any code with an "acpi" in the file path or filename should
> be any updates to the convenience structure definitions in acpitbl1.h
>
> thanks,
> -Len
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists