linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/8] [Intel IOMMU] Support for Intel Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:31:33 -0700
From:	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc:	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...l.org, gregkh@...e.de, muli@...ibm.com,
	asit.k.mallick@...el.com, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
	anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
	shaohua.li@...el.com, keith.packard@...el.com
Subject: Re: [patch 0/8] [Intel IOMMU] Support for Intel Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O

On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 09:49:55AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Monday 09 April 2007 23:55:52 Ashok Raj wrote:
> 
> > Please help review and provide feedback.
> 
> High level question: how did you solve the "user X server needs IOMMU bypass"
> problem?

There is no special consideration for user space. Since all useful memeory is 
mapped 1-1, guess user space would work as is. Unless iam missing something 
here.. so yes.. there is no protection with 1-1, but guess its like 
compatibility mode until the code gets converted over.

Keith: cced says some of the user space side also is getting converted over with
some driver support possibly. So this is an interim problem until X catches up
with it.
> 
> -Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/