[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070410164441.GB104@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:44:41 +0400
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jack Steiner <steiner@...ricas.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: init's children list is long and slows reaping children.
On 04/10, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> I'm trying to remember what the story is now. There is a nasty
> race somewhere with reparenting, a threaded parent setting SIGCHLD to
> SIGIGN, and non-default signals that results in an zombie that no one
> can wait for and reap. It requires being reparented twice to trigger.
reparent_thread:
...
/* If we'd notified the old parent about this child's death,
* also notify the new parent.
*/
if (!traced && p->exit_state == EXIT_ZOMBIE &&
p->exit_signal != -1 && thread_group_empty(p))
do_notify_parent(p, p->exit_signal);
We notified /sbin/init. If it ignores SIGCHLD, we should release the task.
We don't do this.
The best fix I believe is to cleanup the forget_original_parent/reparent_thread
interaction and factor out this "exit_state == EXIT_ZOMBIE && exit_signal == -1"
checks.
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists