linux-kernel - [PATCH] Fix race between attach_task and cpuset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070410171257.GC3611@in.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:42:57 +0530
From:	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
To:	"Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
Cc:	"Paul Jackson" <pj@....com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Balbir Singh" <balbir@...ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix race between attach_task and cpuset_exit

On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 10:55:01PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> Shouldn't we just put a task_lock()/task_unlock() around these lines
> and leave everything else as-is?
> 
> 	task_lock(tsk);
> 	cs = tsk->cpuset;
> 	tsk->cpuset = &top_cpuset;	/* the_top_cpuset_hack - see above */
> 	task_unlock(tsk)

Andrew,
	Can you drop fix-race-between-attach_task-and-cpuset_exit.patch
and take this fix instead, which addresses some points raised by Paul
Menage?





Currently cpuset_exit() changes the exiting task's ->cpuset pointer w/o
taking task_lock().  This can lead to ugly races between attach_task and
cpuset_exit.  Details of the races are described at
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/24/132.

Patch below closes those races.  It is against 2.6.21-rc6-mm1 and has
undergone a simple compile/boot test on a x86_64 box.

Signed-off-by : Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>


---


diff -puN kernel/cpuset.c~cpuset_race_fix kernel/cpuset.c
--- linux-2.6.21-rc6/kernel/cpuset.c~cpuset_race_fix	2007-04-10 20:53:57.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc6-vatsa/kernel/cpuset.c	2007-04-10 22:08:46.000000000 +0530
@@ -2119,10 +2119,6 @@ void cpuset_fork(struct task_struct *chi
  * it is holding that mutex while calling check_for_release(),
  * which calls kmalloc(), so can't be called holding callback_mutex().
  *
- * We don't need to task_lock() this reference to tsk->cpuset,
- * because tsk is already marked PF_EXITING, so attach_task() won't
- * mess with it, or task is a failed fork, never visible to attach_task.
- *
  * the_top_cpuset_hack:
  *
  *    Set the exiting tasks cpuset to the root cpuset (top_cpuset).
@@ -2161,8 +2157,10 @@ void cpuset_exit(struct task_struct *tsk
 {
 	struct cpuset *cs;
 
+	task_lock(current);
 	cs = tsk->cpuset;
 	tsk->cpuset = &top_cpuset;	/* the_top_cpuset_hack - see above */
+	task_unlock(current);
 
 	if (notify_on_release(cs)) {
 		char *pathbuf = NULL;
_

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/