linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] console UTF-8 fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <461BC99F.7020604@zytor.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:30:07 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Egmont Koblinger <egmont@...linux.hu>
CC:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] console UTF-8 fixes

Egmont Koblinger wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 08:43:14AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> 
>> I don't see the point in dealing with one particular corner case,
> 
> I wouldn't really call CJK a *corner* case, just think of how many people
> use these writing systems.
> 
> Theoretically it's just one particular case, I agree. In practice, however,
> this case occurs relatively often compared to all the nontrivial cases a
> full-featured terminal should cope with.
> 

Really?  Why is CJK so much more fundamental than, say, Arabic?

	-hpa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/