[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0704102249290.32056@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:50:28 +0200 (MEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: Milind Arun Choudhary <milindchoudhary@...il.com>
cc: kernel-janitors@...ts.osdl.org, kernelnewbies@...linux.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [KJ]remove SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED
On Apr 10 2007 23:46, Milind Arun Choudhary wrote:
>"use spin_lock_init instead of SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED"
Fact is, we cannot remove SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED. It's needed for
variables outside functions:
static spinlock_t foobar = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
>let me know if this is fine ..
not for me to comment :)
> aerdrv.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv.c
>index db6ad8e..6846fb4 100644
>--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv.c
>+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv.c
>@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static struct aer_rpc* aer_alloc_rpc(struct pcie_device *dev)
> * Initialize Root lock access, e_lock, to Root Error Status Reg,
> * Root Error ID Reg, and Root error producer/consumer index.
> */
>- rpc->e_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
>+ spin_lock_init(&rpc->e_lock);
>
> rpc->rpd = dev;
> INIT_WORK(&rpc->dpc_handler, aer_isr);
>
>
>--
>Milind Arun Choudhary
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists