[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5c49b0ed0704101422k42841e33q50e8da578b215797@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:22:03 -0700
From: "Nate Diller" <nate.diller@...il.com>
To: "Anton Altaparmakov" <aia21@....ac.uk>
Cc: "Alexander Viro" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linux Filesystems" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: use memclear_highpage_flush to zero page data
On 4/10/07, Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@....ac.uk> wrote:
> On 10 Apr 2007, at 07:10, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 21:31:37 -0700 Nate Diller
> > <nate.diller@...il.com> wrote:
> >> It's very common for file systems to need to zero part or all of a
> >> page, the
> >> simplist way is just to use kmap_atomic() and memset(). There's
> >> actually a
> >> library function in include/linux/highmem.h that does exactly
> >> that, but it's
> >> confusingly named memclear_highpage_flush(), which is descriptive
> >> of *how*
> >> it does the work rather than what the *purpose* is. So this patch
> >> renames
> >> the function to zero_page_data(), and calls it from the various
> >> places that
> >> currently open code it.
> >>
> >> Compile tested in x86_64.
> >>
> >> signed-off-by: Nate Diller <nate.diller@...il.com>
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> drivers/block/loop.c | 6 ---
> >> fs/affs/file.c | 6 ---
> >> fs/buffer.c | 53 ++++
> >> +--------------------------
> >> fs/direct-io.c | 8 +---
> >> fs/ecryptfs/mmap.c | 14 +-------
> >> fs/ext3/inode.c | 12 +------
> >> fs/ext4/inode.c | 12 +------
> >> fs/ext4/writeback.c | 12 +------
> >> fs/gfs2/bmap.c | 6 ---
> >> fs/mpage.c | 11 +-----
> >> fs/nfs/read.c | 10 ++---
> >> fs/nfs/write.c | 2 -
> >> fs/ntfs/aops.c | 32 +++---------------
> >> fs/ntfs/file.c | 47 ++++
> >> +----------------------
> >> fs/ocfs2/aops.c | 5 --
> >> fs/reiser4/plugin/file/cryptcompress.c | 19 +----------
> >> fs/reiser4/plugin/file/file.c | 6 ---
> >> fs/reiser4/plugin/item/ctail.c | 6 ---
> >> fs/reiser4/plugin/item/extent_file_ops.c | 19 +++--------
> >> fs/reiser4/plugin/item/tail.c | 8 +---
> >> fs/reiserfs/file.c | 39 +++++
> >> +----------------
> >> fs/reiserfs/inode.c | 13 +------
> >> fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_lrw.c | 2 -
> >> include/linux/highmem.h | 2 -
> >> mm/filemap_xip.c | 7 ----
> >> mm/truncate.c | 2 -
> >> 26 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 281 deletions(-)
> >>
> >
> > Not sure that I agree with the name zero_page_data(). People might
> > use it
> > to, err, zero a page's data. Whereas it is really only for use
> > against
> > *user* pages. zero_user_page(), perhaps.
> >
> > Plus..
> >
> > This patch as presented causes me surprising amounts of trouble. I
> > need to
> > split it up into
> >
> > - core plus filesystems which don't have maintainers (for me to
> > merge)
> >
> > - filesystems which do have maintainers (one patch per), for
> > maintainers to merge.
> >
> > - another patch for reiser4, to remain in -mm.
> >
> > And this is actually not possible to do, because my merge and the
> > subsystem
> > maintainers' merges will happen at different times. In the
> > intervening
> > window, the kernel won't compile.
> >
> > So instead I need to
> >
> > - split off the reiser4 bit
> >
> > - get acks from fs maintainers on the rest
> >
> > - merge the whole thing in one hit (minus reiser4)
> >
> > And I can do that, but it is the less preferable option.
> >
> >
> > The better way to do this merge is:
> >
> > patch #1:
> >
> > static inline void memclear_highpage_flush(...) __deprecated
> > {
> > zero_user_page(...);
> > }
> >
> > patch #2..n: convert filesystems.
> >
> >
> > then, when all filesystems are converted, we're ready to remove
> > memclear_highpage_flush(). But we do that six months later - let's
> > not
> > screw out-of-tree fs maintainers (and their users) unnecessarily.
>
> Nate, I think you either do not understand what the KM_* constants
> passed to kmap_atomic() mean or you were overeager in your code
> replacement... You really, really cannot replace KM_BIO_SRC_IRQ with
> KM_USER0 in the NTFS i/o completion handler without trashing people's
> data left right an centre!
good catch, I was indeed careless on that one. I just double checked
all the other changes and that was the only non-KM_USER0 that slipped
through. Thanks!
I will submit a new patch later today that fixes this problem and the
issues AKPM raised.
NATE
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists