[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704101722030.24526@CPE00045a9c397f-CM001225dbafb6>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:25:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
cc: Milind Arun Choudhary <milindchoudhary@...il.com>,
kernel-janitors@...ts.osdl.org, kernelnewbies@...linux.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [KJ]remove SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Apr 10 2007 23:46, Milind Arun Choudhary wrote:
>
> >"use spin_lock_init instead of SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED"
>
> Fact is, we cannot remove SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED. It's needed for
> variables outside functions:
>
> static spinlock_t foobar = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
but that's where you would use the more explicit
__RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED, no? AFAIK, you really can remove the macro
SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED in its entirety.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists