linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Account for module percpu space separately from kernel percpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m1abxfyiwk.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:16:43 -0600
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Account for module percpu space separately from kernel percpu

Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> writes:

> Rather than using a single constant PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM, compute it as
> the sum of kernel_percpu + PERCPU_MODULE_RESERVE.  This is now common
> to all architectures; if an architecture wants to set
> PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM to something special, then it may do so (ia64 is
> the only one which does).

I think I have already done this but in case I haven't.
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>

I see any problems there.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/