[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200704110020.35746.ioe-lkml@rameria.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:20:33 +0200
From: Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@...eria.de>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jack Steiner <steiner@...ricas.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: init's children list is long and slows reaping children.
On Tuesday 10 April 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> That's why I feel thread creation -- cheap under Linux -- is quite
> appropriate for many of these situations.
Maybe that (thread creation) can be done at open(), socket-creation,
service request, syscall or whatever event triggers a driver/subsystem
to actually queue work into a thread.
And when there is a close(), socket-destruction, service completion
or whatever these threads can be marked for destruction and destroyed
by a timer or even immediately.
Regards
Ingo Oeser
--
If something is getting cheap, it is getting wasted just because it is cheap.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists