[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <461C16E0.6010702@vmware.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:59:44 -0700
From: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/10] Vmi timer update.patch
Chris Wright wrote:
> * Zachary Amsden (zach@...are.com) wrote:
>
>> Yes, but unfortunately that is a nop:
>>
>> /*
>> * Avoid unnecessary state transitions, as it confuses
>> * Geode / Cyrix based boxen.
>> */
>> case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN:
>> if (evt->mode == CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED)
>> break;
>> case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED:
>> if (evt->mode == CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN)
>> break;
>>
>
> This one should be fallthrough case during exchange (mode == PERIODIC)
>
Yes, seems PERIODIC->SHUTDOWN should do the right thing.
>> case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT:
>> /* One shot setup */
>> outb_p(0x38, PIT_MODE);
>>
>> So switching from PIT to VMI does not disable PIT timer interrupts.
>> Thus I have to keep this part of the patch.
>>
Since I misread the code, I can drop this now.
>
> Oh, I was looking at this (x86_64 work I have here):
>
> case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN:
> case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED:
> outb_p(0x30, PIT_MODE);
> outb_p(0, PIT_CH0); /* LSB */
> outb_p(0, PIT_CH0); /* MSB */
> break;
>
> That's mode 0, not mode 5, but I think the end result is the same.
>
Yes, mode 0, 4, 5 all should behave similarly.
Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists