linux-kernel - Re: Why kmem_cache_free occupy CPU for more than 10 seconds?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ac8af0be0704110214qdca2ee9t3b44a17341e53730@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:14:46 +0800
From:	"Zhao Forrest" <forrest.zhao@...il.com>
To:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why kmem_cache_free occupy CPU for more than 10 seconds?

I enable CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB, but don't get any extra debug messages
related to slab.
Is there other switch that I need to turn on?

Thanks,
Forrest

BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#6!

Call Trace:
 <IRQ>  [<ffffffff800b3834>] softlockup_tick+0xdb/0xed
 [<ffffffff80093edf>] update_process_times+0x42/0x68
 [<ffffffff80074897>] smp_local_timer_interrupt+0x23/0x47
 [<ffffffff80074f59>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x41/0x47
 [<ffffffff8005c7c2>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x66/0x6c
 <EOI>  [<ffffffff80043b09>] invalidate_mapping_pages+0xe1/0x15f
 [<ffffffff80043afa>] invalidate_mapping_pages+0xd2/0x15f
 [<ffffffff800d5bea>] kill_bdev+0xe/0x21
 [<ffffffff800d6110>] __blkdev_put+0x4f/0x169
 [<ffffffff80012785>] __fput+0xae/0x198
 [<ffffffff80023ca6>] filp_close+0x5c/0x64
 [<ffffffff80038e33>] put_files_struct+0x6c/0xc3
 [<ffffffff8001543d>] do_exit+0x2d2/0x8b1
 [<ffffffff80047932>] cpuset_exit+0x0/0x6c
 [<ffffffff8002b30f>] get_signal_to_deliver+0x427/0x456
 [<ffffffff80059b9e>] do_notify_resume+0x9c/0x7a9
 [<ffffffff8008776d>] default_wake_function+0x0/0xe
 [<ffffffff800b2b79>] audit_syscall_exit+0x2cd/0x2ec
 [<ffffffff8005be62>] int_signal+0x12/0x17


On 4/11/07, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
> On 4/11/07, Zhao Forrest <forrest.zhao@...il.com> wrote:
> > We're using RHEL5 with kernel version 2.6.18-8.el5.
> > When doing a stress test on raw device for about 3-4 hours, we found
> > the soft lockup message in dmesg.
> > I know we're not reporting the bug on the latest kernel, but does any
> > expert know if this is the known issue in old kernel? Or why
> > kmem_cache_free occupy CPU for more than 10 seconds?
>
> Sounds like slab corruption. CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB should tell you more.
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/