[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <461CAB48.8010801@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:32:56 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
CC: gregkh@...e.de, maneesh@...ibm.com, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
oneukum@...e.de, rpurdie@...ys.net, James.Bottomley@...elEye.com,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14 UPDATED] sysfs: implement sysfs_dirent active reference
and immediate disconnect
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> =======================================================
>> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
>> 2.6.21-rc6-ge666c753-dirty #54
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> kslowcrw/64 is trying to acquire lock:
>> (&sch->reg_mutex){--..}, at: [<00000000004233b2>] mutex_lock+0x3e/0x4c
>>
>> but task is already holding lock:
>> (&sd->s_active){----}, at: [<0000000000209578>] remove_dir+0xec/0x144
>>
>> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
> This is probably because s_active has different write locked and
> unlocked by different threads but it doesn't tell lockdep about it.
s/has different/is/
Sorry.
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists