| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0704111134300.32056@yvahk01.tjqt.qr> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:35:17 +0200 (MEST) From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de> To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com> cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: "menu" versus "menuconfig" -- they're *both* a bad idea On Apr 11 2007 05:25, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> On Apr 11 2007 03:58, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >> >> A CONFIG_EMBEDDED bug. This should perhaps be changed. >> Or at best, deactivate the ---> part when it's N. > > i'm not sure what you mean by "bug". if what you mean is that it's >a bad choice of menu layout, i agree. but what's happening there is >not technically "wrong" or "buggy" in the sense that it's perfectly >legal based on the current design of "menuconfig". Of course. Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists