[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070411112105.GA24813@in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:51:05 +0530
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Robin Holt <holt@....com>, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vatsa@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kthread: Don't depend on work queues
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:13:34PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> It should be calling try_to_freeze() somewhere anyway. We may need to freeze
> all tasks in some cases.
How about
for (;;) {
try_to_freeze();
?
This change allows us to make all the worker threads freezeable by default.
>From cpu-hotplug perspective, helper_wq was the only singlethreaded
non-freezeable workqueue.
>
> Greetings,
> Rafael
> -
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
--
Gautham R Shenoy
Linux Technology Center
IBM India.
"Freedom comes with a price tag of responsibility, which is still a bargain,
because Freedom is priceless!"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists