linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/13] fs: convert core functions to zero_user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:54:22 +0200
From:	Jörn Engel <joern@...ybastard.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Nate Diller <nate.diller@...il.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/13] fs: convert core functions to zero_user_page

On Tue, 10 April 2007 22:56:38 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> And I'm surprised that this:
> 
> +static inline void memclear_highpage_flush(struct page *page, unsigned int offset, unsigned int size)
> +{
> +	return zero_user_page(page, offset, size);
> +}
> 
> compiled.  zero_user_page() returns void...

As does memclear_highpage_flush().  Some of my code looks like:
void some_func(...)
{
	if (foo)
		return do_foo(...);
	if (bar)
		return do_bar(...);
	...
}

do_foo() and do_bar() also return void.  Saves an extra line for the
return statment and the brackets.

Doesn't help in the code you quoted, of course.

Jörn

-- 
Measure. Don't tune for speed until you've measured, and even then
don't unless one part of the code overwhelms the rest.
-- Rob Pike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/