[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.0.83.0704111109390.13251@sigma.j-a-k-j.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:12:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: "John Anthony Kazos Jr." <jakj@...-k-j.com>
To: Phillip Susi <psusi@....rr.com>
cc: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de>,
Dave Dillow <dave@...dillows.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Subject: Re: I give up
> > I violently agree on that point, but the limited conversations I've had with
> > the tar maintainer so far indicates that AFAHIC, its linux that's broken. A
> > new device number is a new disk and must be treated as such.
>
> Sumbit a patch adding an option to ignore the device number, and slap him
> around a bit with a large trout ;)
I think that's especially true. If a user begins with a single full disk
for their entire filesystem, uses tar to backup, and then later adds a
second disk, copies everything from /usr and /home onto partitions there
(making sure to preserve all interesting bits like ctime/mtime), and
mounts them over the original directories, tar should not decide that
every file in /usr and /home was deleted and recreated.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists