linux-kernel - Re: Build error : 2.6.21-rc6-mm1 on sparc64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:34:29 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao 
	<fernando@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Build error : 2.6.21-rc6-mm1 on sparc64

On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:15:39 +0900 Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao <fernando@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:

> The problem is that to use hard_smp_processor_id in UP kernels just
> including linux/smp.h does not suffice anymore. Now
> hard_smp_processor_id is architecture specific code and consequently
> asm/smp.h should be included explicitly.

yeah.  The fact that linux/smp.h only exposes asm/smp.h if CONFIG_SMP hits
us again and again and again.  It would be good to fix that up, I guess by
including asm/smp.h unconditionally from within linux/smp.h.

But that's a separate little project.

> Mathieu, does the (untested) patch below fix this issue?

I'll test it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/