[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070411195256.GD9602@mami.zabbo.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:52:56 -0700
From: Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>
To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Cc: Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-aio@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] convert aio event reap to use atomic-op instead of spin_lock
> > I kept on getting requests from application developers who want that
> > feature. My initial patch was dated back May 2004.
>
> The right way to do it involves synchronization between the kernel side
> io_getevents() and the userspace code pulling events out of the ring.
> Alan Cox suggested embedding a futex in the shared memory region, but I
> don't think anyone ever implemented that.
Yeah, I like the idea of futexes.
I'm worried that virtual aliasing spells doom for the current
home-brewed serialization that fs/aio.c is doing with the shared ring
head/tail accesses. Am I worrying about nothing here?
> > I will look into this aside from this patch.
>
> That's probably the case. Also, any changes in this area *must* correctly
> update the compat/incompat feature flags in the ring buffer header. That
> has been missed in the past...
Do you know of anyone using the current ring info ABI?
The *only* user I know of is the check of ctx->magic in libaio.
- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists