[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0704111506040.28394@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Lang <david.lang@...italinsight.com>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Jörn Engel <joern@...ybastard.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: If not readdir() then what?
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Neil Brown wrote:
> For the second.
> You say that you " would need at least 96 bits in order to make that
> guarantee; 64 bits of hash, plus a 32-bit count value in the hash
> collision chain". I think 96 is a bit greedy. Surely 48 bits of
> hash and 16 bits of collision-chain-position would plenty. You would
> need 65537 entries before a collision was even possible, and
> billions before it was at all likely. (How big does a set of 48bit
> numbers have to get before the probability that "No subset of 65536
> numbers are all the same" drops below 0.95?)
Neil,
you can get a hash collision with two entries.
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists