| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:18:38 +0900 From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> To: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com> CC: gregkh@...e.de, maneesh@...ibm.com, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, oneukum@...e.de, rpurdie@...ys.net, James.Bottomley@...elEye.com, stern@...land.harvard.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHSET #master] sysfs: make sysfs disconnect immediately on deletion, take 2 Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 13:18:46 +0900, > Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> wrote: > >> With all the patches applied, the same test used in the last take ran >> 9+hrs without any problem. > > I get the following on startup: > > ===================================== > [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ] > ------------------------------------- > start_udev/197 is trying to release lock (&sd->s_active) at: > [<0000000000209024>] release_sysfs_dirent+0x8c/0x118 > but there are no more locks to release! Thanks a lot for spotting this. I thought I enabled lock debugging but apparently, didn't. Anyways, the bug doesn't affect actual behavior. It's just doing up_write() on an unlocked rwsem which is about to be freed. I've just posted the updated version of patch 12 to fix this. -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists