lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:48:30 +0800 From: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [-mm3 patch]Warning fix: check the return value of kobject_add etc. On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 02:23:49PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: >On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 02:20:46PM +0800, Cong WANG wrote: >> 2007/4/1, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>: >> > >> >Also, please always prepare patches in `patch -p1' form, as per >> >http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt, thanks. >> > >> > >> >> Sorry. I am confused with this. Does that mean I should make patches >> _upon_ the root kernel source directory or first make a copy of the >> original source code and then diff against the two dirs? But I was >> told that "patches should be based _in_ the root kernel source >> directory" and when only one file was modified just to diff it with >> the original single file. (See Documentation/SubmittingPatches.) >> >> Can you help out? And should I remake this patch? Thanks again! > >quilt(http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/quilt) is your friend. > >cd /usr/src/linux >quilt new my-fix.patch >quilt edit mm/readahead.c >quilt refresh --diffstat >quilt diff >... Thanks. I will try it. ;-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists