linux-kernel - Re: tmpfs and the OOM killer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:35:32 -0300
From:	Pedro <linux_user@...cksohn.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tmpfs and the OOM killer

On Thursday 12 April 2007 08:25, Theodore Tso wrote:
> likely going to be in deep trouble anyway.  Even if you disable the
> OOM killer, now random malloc()'s will start returning NULL because
> your system doesn't have enough memory.  Do you have intelligent error
> handling and recovery mechanisms for every single malloc() failure?

  When malloc return NULL, the process may tell the user ENOMEM.
  When OOM kill the process, the user claim the program sometimes die.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/