linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] UDF cleanup and fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070412155946.GA7613@dose.home.local>
Date:	Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:59:46 +0200
From:	Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@....de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] UDF cleanup and fixes

On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 18:01:12 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 04-04-07 08:36:20, Tino Keitel wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 10:48:27 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > > Well, it works for me on 32-bit as well, right up to 100% full.
> > > No problems at all...
> > 
> > Maybe it depends on the kernel. I patched 2.6.20 with the patches
> > above and got the described behaviour.
>   I've sent you an email with a few questions but probably it got lost in
> the noise... Are you able to reproduce the problem? Have you reproduced the
> problem on a freshly created UDF image or was it some older image?

Hi,

I can't remember of any errors in the kernel or about not available
space. It was an image file that I expermimented with, and I did
multiple mkudffs runs on the file. Could it be that the behaviour was
caused by stale data inside the image?

Regards,
Tino

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/