[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0704121840350.14441@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 18:41:22 +0200 (MEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
cc: Egmont Koblinger <egmont@...linux.hu>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] console UTF-8 fixes
On Apr 12 2007 08:36, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Egmont Koblinger wrote:
>
>> > Besides, would it not make more sense to have a single table with the
>> > width information, if you insist on having one, instead of multiple
>> > ones?
>>
>> I've been thinking on it and I'm not sure which one the right way is. The
>> reason for choosing this was probably that this way information that is
>> not
>> used by the code can be omitted by the compiler.
>
> Then let's leave it out of the source.
I however will put this into my rpm if it works/isstable.
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists