lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:18:31 -0400 From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org> To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Jörn Engel <joern@...ybastard.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: If not readdir() then what? On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 08:21:16AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > Again, compared to a directory fd cache, what you're proposing a huge > hit to the filesystem, and at the moment, given that telldir/seekdir > is rarely used by everyone else, it's mainly NFS which is the main bad > actor here by insisting on the use of a small 31/63-bit cookie as a > condition of protocol correctness. If we want to get bigger cookies into the protocol, then the sooner we start working on that the better.... How big is big enough? And is a larger cookie sufficient on its own? --b. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists