[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1176400366.20237.54.camel@imap.mvista.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:52:46 -0700
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ell.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
johnstul@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386 tsc: remove xtime_lock'ing around cpufreq notifier
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 10:43 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > hm. People (ab)use sched_clock() for all sorts of things nowadays. I wouldn't
> > do anything to degrade it just on behalf of printk-timestamping.
> >
>
> printk was the only non-scheduler-ish use I could find. Are there others?
>
> J
There is some usage in block/blktrace.c (which I've not seen before..)
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists