[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <461E7E0A.60002@vmware.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:44:26 -0700
From: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...are.com>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Pte xchg optimization.patch
Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 10:30:58PM -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> > In situations where page table updates need only be made locally, and there
> > is no cross-processor A/D bit races involved, we need not use the heavyweight
> > xchg instruction to atomically fetch and clear page table entries. Instead,
> > we can just read and clear them directly.
> >
> > This introduces a neat optimization for non-SMP kernels; drop the atomic
> > xchg operations from page table updates.
>
> Would it be feasible to do this using the smp_alternatives stuff?
> Given many distros are now shipping SMP-only kernels, it'd be nice
> to get that win without using having to rebuild their kernels.
>
That's a good point. It is a fairly straightforward substitution for the
static case:
xchg reg, mem
to
mov mem, reg
mov imm, mem
I'll give it a spin and see how it drives. It is, though, less obvious
how easy it will be for PAE kernels.
Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists