[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <461E8D16.6060202@goop.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 12:48:38 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...are.com>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Pte drop ptep_get_and_clear paravirt op.patch
Zachary Amsden wrote:
> In shadow mode hypervisors, ptep_get_and_clear achieves the desired
> purpose of keeping the shadows in sync by issuing a native_get_and_clear,
> followed by a call to pte_update, which indicates the PTE has been
> modified.
>
> Direct mode hypervisors (Xen) have no need for this anyway, and will trap
> the update using writable pagetables.
>
> This means no hypervisor makes use of ptep_get_and_clear; there is no
> reason to have it in the paravirt-ops structure. Change confusing
> terminology about raw vs. native functions into consistent use of
> native_pte_xxx for operations which do not invoke paravirt-ops.
>
Looks OK to me. Are you going to put this into the pvops queue?
Acked-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...source.com>
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists