[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070412073918.GA1680@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:39:18 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Cc: gregkh@...e.de, maneesh@...ibm.com, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
cornelia.huck@...ibm.com, oneukum@...e.de, rpurdie@...ys.net,
James.Bottomley@...elEye.com, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14 UPDATED] sysfs: implement sysfs_dirent active
reference and immediate disconnect
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 12:18:15AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 01:15:15PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > [PATCH] sysfs: implement sysfs_dirent active reference and immediate disconnect
>
> For some reason, this doesn't apply on top of your patches:
>
> Applying patch sysfs-implement-sysfs_dirent-active-reference-and-immediate-disconnect.patch
> patching file fs/sysfs/dir.c
> patching file fs/sysfs/sysfs.h
> patching file fs/sysfs/bin.c
> patching file fs/sysfs/file.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 96 (offset 8 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 107 (offset 8 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 240 (offset 8 lines).
> Hunk #4 FAILED at 300.
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 336 (offset 14 lines).
> Hunk #6 succeeded at 368 (offset 14 lines).
> Hunk #7 succeeded at 435 (offset 14 lines).
> 1 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file fs/sysfs/file.c
> patching file fs/sysfs/inode.c
>
> So I'll only apply the first 11 for now. Can you respin the last 3 and
> send them to me again?
Oh nevermind, this was my fault, it was due to something else of mine
that isn't in mainline, sorry for the noise...
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists