[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070413130119.GA164@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:01:19 +0400
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] fix kthread_create() vs freezer theoretical race
kthread() sleeps in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state waiting for the first wakeup.
In theory, this wakeup may come from freeze_process()->signal_wake_up(),
so the task can disappear even before kthread_create() sets its ->comm.
Change kthread() to use TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
--- 2.6.21-rc5/kernel/kthread.c~0_FREEZER 2007-04-13 14:52:44.000000000 +0400
+++ 2.6.21-rc5/kernel/kthread.c 2007-04-13 15:36:43.000000000 +0400
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static int kthread(void *_create)
data = create->data;
/* OK, tell user we're spawned, wait for stop or wakeup */
- __set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ __set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
complete(&create->started);
schedule();
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kthread_create);
*/
void kthread_bind(struct task_struct *k, unsigned int cpu)
{
- BUG_ON(k->state != TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ BUG_ON(k->state != TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
/* Must have done schedule() in kthread() before we set_task_cpu */
wait_task_inactive(k);
set_task_cpu(k, cpu);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists