[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070412225843.GA3713@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:58:43 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] sysfs: Remove first pass at shadow directory
support
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 10:48:42AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> While shadow directories appear to be a good idea, the current scheme
> of controlling their creation and destruction outside of sysfs appears
> to be a locking and maintenance nightmare in the face of sysfs directories
> dynamically coming and going. Which can now occur for directories containing
> network devices when CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED is not set.
>
> This patch removes everything from the initial shadow directory support
> that allowed the shadow directory creation to be controlled at a higher
> level. So except for a few bits of sysfs_rename_dir everything from
> commit b592fcfe7f06c15ec11774b5be7ce0de3aa86e73 is now gone.
Can you rebase patches 2-5 on the latest -mm? Tejun redid the whole
sysfs internals which pretty much means that this patch series doesn't
apply anymore :(
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists