[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200704131218.44045.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:18:43 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Rudolf Marek <r.marek@...embler.cz>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
lm-sensors@...sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Could the k8temp driver be interfering with ACPI?
On Friday 02 March 2007 07:03, Jean Delvare wrote:
> ... The primary issue is the concurrent access
> to resources, which cause lots of trouble which are hard to investigate.
> If ACPI reserves the ports, then the SMBus or hardware monitoring
> drivers (or any other conflicting driver) will cleanly fail to load,
> which would be a move in the right direction. ...
>
> So, can ACPI actually reserve the ports it accesses?
Sorry to join this discussion so late.
ACPI tells us the resources used by devices. Today, we don't reserve
ACPI resources until a driver claims a device. PCI does some sort of
reservation up front, before the driver claims devices. Conceptually,
I think ACPI should do the same thing, and I don't think it's that
hard to do.
But breaking things like lmsensors would make the transition painful.
Bjorn
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists