| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <461FDDF9.7040503@rtr.ca> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:46:01 -0400 From: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca> To: Buytaert_Steven@....com Cc: davidsen@....com, andi@...stfloor.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: sched_yield proposals/rationale Buytaert_Steven@....com wrote: >> From: Bill Davidsen >> >> And having gotten same, are you going to code up what appears to be a >> solution, based on this feedback? > > The feedback was helpful in verifying whether there are any arguments against my approach. The real proof is in the pudding. > > I'm running a kernel with these changes, as we speak. Overall system throughput is about up 20%. With 'system throughput' I mean measured performance of a rather large (experimental) system. The patch isn't even 24h old... Also the application latency has improved. Cool. You *do know* that there is a brand new CPU scheduler scheduled to replace the current one for the 2.6.22 Kernel, right? -ml - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists