linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.20 OOM with 8Gb RAM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:54:33 -0700
From:	William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Jason Lunz <lunz@...ooley.org>, Cameron Schaus <cam@...aus.ca>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.20 OOM with 8Gb RAM

On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:46:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> It's just weird - it exploits internal knowledge of VFS behaviour, diddles
> with pagecache within a fake disk strategy handler, etc.
> Furthermore, because it pretends to be a block device, the VFS will not use
> highmem pages when accessing the ramdisk.  So the 8GB machine will go splat
> with only 800MB of ramdisk.
> ramfs is much cleaner and does not have that limitation.

After all this time, bdevs are still lowmem etc. Crying shame.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/